Skip to main content

Skip to main navigation

Crunch Time in Geneva

Benchmarks, plurilaterals, domestic regulation and other pressure tactics in the GATS negotiations

Printed copies of this article can be purchased from the National Office for: $10

About this Publication

Global civil society should not be lulled into complacency by gloomy media reports about the deadlock in the Doha Round negotiations. While agricultural and other important issues remain serious obstacles to a deal, negotiators continue to work non-stop in Geneva. The decision whether to close a deal is a political one that will be made, as in past rounds, by a small group of powerful governments.

If there is a breakthrough on agriculture, the pressure will rapidly intensify for a large package of GATS commitments. Even if a deal can not be concluded by year-end, negotiators are currently making critical decisions, including about the text of new GATS rules restricting domestic regulation. These threatened rules would seriously curtail the right to regulate and weaken governments’ ability to protect the public.

At the December 2005 Hong Kong ministerial meeting, developed countries forced through a controversial set of services demands that prepared the ground for a final push to expand the GATS. This new paper analyses benchmarks, plurilateral request-offer, domestic regulation and other pressure tactics so that non-governmental organizations, elected representatives, developing countries and ordinary citizens can intervene to counter them.

Find Publications

Support Our Work

Over the last 30 years, the CCPA has provided alternative research and analysis that have been indispensable in exposing the corporate agenda. I don’t know what I’d have done without them.

— Judy Rebick

Join or Donate

Email Newswire

Stay up to date on new research:
About our newswire service
CCPA National Office | Suite 500, 251 Bank Street, Ottawa ON, K2P 1X3 | Tel: 613-563-1341 | Fax: 613-233-1458 | E-mail: ccpa@policyalternatives.ca
© 2013 Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives | research • analysis • solutions | Want to use something on this site? View our terms of re(use)
Website Design & Development by Raised Eyebrow Web Studio