Skip to main content

Skip to main navigation

Trade and Investment Research Project

The CETA and Health Care Reservations

A briefing note for the Canadian Health Coalition

About this Publication

There is a clear incompatibility between Canadian health care policies and the increasing scope of international trade and investment treaties. Canada’s public health insurance system and the regulations around who can provide health care services and on what terms (including the Canada Health Act) cut against the grain of such treaties, which, in contrast to Medicare, tend to place the ability to make profits before the needs of citizens.

Consequently, successive Canadian governments have negotiated exemptions for health care in Canada’s trade and investment agreements. These exemptions, while flawed, are vital in ensuring Canadian governments’ ability to maintain existing health measures and to adopt new health measures that might otherwise be challenged under international trade and investment treaties.

The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) currently being negotiated by Canada and the European Union threatens to erode Canada’s existing protections for health care. There is an urgent need to raise awareness of this threat and to build support for a broad exemption that would fully shield the Canadian health care system.

NAFTA Chapter 11 an increasing threat to the public good

All levels of government, particularly in Canada, are being targeted by investors for alleged breaches of Chapter 11, NAFTA’s investment chapter, says a new report by CCPA trade analyst Scott Sinclair.

The report documents all 66 known NAFTA investor-state claims (to October 2010) and analyses recent key developments, including the Canadian government’s troubling decision to settle AbitibiBowater’s NAFTA claim by paying the company $CAD 130 million.

Investor-state claims as of October 1, 2010 include 28 against Canada, 19 against the U.S., and 19 against Mexico. Canada has paid out NAFTA damages totaling $CAD157 million, while Mexico has paid damages of $US187 million. The U.S. has yet to lose a NAFTA chapter 11 case. All three governments have incurred tens of millions of dollars in legal costs to defend themselves against investor claims.

“This situation has become a legal and economic minefield, with governments too often finding that the best interests of their citizens are trumped by the ability of multinationals to make profits,“ the study notes.

Click here to read the whole study.

NAFTA Chapter 11 Investor-State Disputes to October 2010

Reports & Studies
Printed copies of this article can be purchased from the for: $10

Out of Equilibrium

The Impact of EU-Canada Free Trade on the Real Economy

A Canada-EU trade deal could cost thousands of Canadian jobs

Canada already has a large bilateral trade deficit with the EU—$15 billion in goods and close to $4 billion in services, and loses some 70,000 jobs as a result. A new CCPA study by Jim Stanford finds a free trade agreement would make that imbalance worse.

Out of Equilibrium: The Impact of EU-Canada Free Trade on the Real Economy models three scenarios to provide a range of estimages regarding the likely impacts of EU-Canada free trade. In every case, Canada's bilateral trade balance worsens significantly. The simulations suggest an incredmental loss of between 28,000 and 150,000 Canadian jobs.

Click here to download the full report.

Why the "Canadian model" cannot be used to promote financial liberalization at the WTO

Despite the 2008 financial meltdown, the World Trade Organization continues to negotiate new rules that would promote foreign takeover of domestic banks and more deregulation. WTO advocates are using Canada to argue that a country can liberalize its financial sector yet suffer comparatively less from financial shocks.

Nobody's Poster Child: Why the "Canadian model" cannot be used to promote financial liberalization at the World Trade Organization, by CCPA Research Associate Ellen Gould shows how the opposite conclusion should be drawn from the Canadian experience, since limits Canada placed on its WTO liberalization were key to stabilizing the banking system during the financial crisis.

Click here to read the full report.

Nobody's Poster Child

Why the “Canadian Model” Cannot Be Used to Promote Financial Liberalization at the World Trade Organization

Reports & Studies
Printed copies of this article can be purchased from the for: $10
Syndicate content

Find Publications

Support Our Work

“We need the CCPA to remind us that our dreams of a decent, egalitarian society are reasonable — indeed that with a little work, they are practical.  And I love that practicality, that protection of the dream of the possible.”

Naomi Klein

Join or Donate

Email Newswire

Stay up to date on new research:
About our newswire service
CCPA National Office | Suite 500, 251 Bank Street, Ottawa ON, K2P 1X3 | Tel: 613-563-1341 | Fax: 613-233-1458 | E-mail: ccpa@policyalternatives.ca
© 2013 Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives | research • analysis • solutions | Want to use something on this site? View our terms of re(use)
Website Design & Development by Raised Eyebrow Web Studio