Skip to main content

Skip to main navigation

Saskatchewan Office

Saskatchewan's Potash: Who Really Benefits? Report

Regina — The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Saskatchewan Office today released Exploiting Saskatchewan’s Potash: Who Benefits? by John W. Warnock. The new report considers the history of potash exploitation in the province with an eye to answering the question of whether the people of Saskatchewan are receiving the full benefit from the exploitation of this strategic natural resource.

With the recent controversy over the proposed BHP Billiton takeover bid of PotashCorp, the question of ownership of Saskatchewan’s vital natural resources are again front and centre. Warnock argues that to ensure that Saskatchewan receives the full benefit of its natural endowment, we must move to a more democratic form of resource ownership and management.

Some of the key questions and insights contained in this history of potash in Saskatchewan include:

  • Public ownership of potash was largely a success, despite current accounts that argue that privatization “rescued” PCS. Between 1978 and 1981, the return on investment ranged between 21 and 34 percent. PCS “added large sums to the provincial revenues well beyond what the mines PCS purchased would have generated through provincial taxes if they had remained in the private sector.”
  • The Devine government sabotaged the profitability of PCS, preventing the Crown from expanding its capacity and undertaking its own marketing operations.
  • The people of Saskatchewan did not get full value for their money during the initial privatization of PCS in the 1980s, with the costs of privatization exceeding the benefits by between $18 and $36 billion.
  • The Saskatchewan public believes PotashCorp to be a Canadian owned and controlled company. However, the Conference Board report commissioned by the Wall government concludes that PotashCorp is “substantially a U.S-based company.” They also describe it as “a North American corporation with Saskatchewan operations” (Conference Board, pp. 23-25).
  • PotashCorp’s gross profit margin for potash in 2009 was an astonishing 60 percent. Why should the private owners be granted a return on investment that is far higher than can be found in any other industry?
  • The average rate for royalties and taxation on potash is 10.8 percent, substantially less than the 25 percent imposed during the Blakeney era.

With potash set to become an ever-more valuable resource due to growing world population and lack of arable land, it is time for the people of Saskatchewan to have a frank and open discussion on how best to manage this resource in the future so that it benefits all the people of our province.

To speak with the author, John W. Warnock, phone: (306) 352-5282.

For more information on the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives – Saskatchewan Office, contact Simon Enoch:

Phone: (306) 924-3372
Email: ccpasask@sasktel.net

Ending Our Addiction to Coal: The Wind and Solar Potential of Saskatchewan

The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Saskatchewan Office released today Transforming Saskatchewan’s Electrical Future: The Potential for Wind and Solar Power, by Mark Bigland-Pritchard, a member of Green Energy Project Saskatchewan. The report offers a practical and workable set of integrated proposals for electrical generation in the medium and long term that has the potential to transform Saskatchewan from coal-dependent laggard to a renewable energy leader.

View the press release here

View the full report here

Transforming Saskatchewan’s Electrical Future (Part 3)

The Potential for Wind and Solar Power

Reports & Studies

Transforming Saskatchewan's Electrical Future: Using Electricity More Efficiently

The Saskatchewan office of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives has just released the second in its series on Transforming Saskatchewan's Electrical Future. Part Two, entitled Using Electricity More Efficiently contains some surprising facts about how much electricity is consumed in our province.

Did you know....

* Potash, oil and gas, steel, mining and chemicals currently consume 34.5% of all electricity in Saskatchewan?

* In ten years, those same industries will consume almost 50% of our province's electricity?

* Residential consumption is only 13.7% of total consumption and expected to drop to 11% in ten years?

Given industry's voracious appetite for cheap subsidized power, it is essential that we adopt a comprehensive conservation and efficiency program to ensure that the people of Saskatchewan are getting a fair deal when it comes to electrical generation in the province.

Read the press release here.

Read the full report here. 

Transforming Saskatchewan’s Electrical Future (Part 2)

Using Electricity More Efficiently

Reports & Studies
Printed copies of this article can be purchased from the for: $10

A plea to reverse the ecological destruction of the Prairies

On October 15th and 16th, prairie naturalist and award-winning author Trevor Herriot spoke on behalf of the Saskatchewan office of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.

Trevor's presentation, "All Flesh is Grass," provides us with both an urgent plea to reverse the ecological destruction of our natural prairie and a way forward to a more sustainable and ecologically sound agricultural practice in our province.

Click here to download the transcript.

All flesh is grass

Toward a re-engagement with the prairie

Commentary and Fact Sheets

Still Open for Business: Potash Decision

Now that Investment Canada has rejected BHP Billiton's hostile takeover bid and the sky has not fallen, perhaps we can finally dispense with the tired argument that restrictions on foreign investment will leave Canada no longer "open for business."

In fact, virtually every OECD country has more stringent restrictions on foreign investment than Canada.

In recent years, the United States has blocked the Chinese takeover of Unocal and the sale of U.S. ports to Dubai Ports Worldwide. In France, rumours of a takeover of Danone by Pepsi forced the French government to draft a law protecting "strategic industries" in that country. Even in Australia, home of BHP, the government rejected a takeover bid for Australian energy company Woodside Petroleum Ltd by Shell Oil on the grounds that is was not in the nation's economic interest.

Canada is not taking a radical stance in rejecting a foreign takeover; it is merely joining with the rest of the world in the realization that nations have vital economic interests that need to be protected. Truly a novel idea.

Simon Enoch

Director

CCPA Saskatchewan

This commentary first appeared in the November 5th edition of the Regina Leader-Post

Syndicate content

Find Publications

Support Our Work

The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives has been, and continues to be, profoundly important to Canadian democracy…. It is virtually unique in its breadth of ideas and its depth of research.

- Ed Broadbent

Join or Donate

Email Newswire

Stay up to date on new research:
About our newswire service
CCPA National Office | Suite 500, 251 Bank Street, Ottawa ON, K2P 1X3 | Tel: 613-563-1341 | Fax: 613-233-1458 | E-mail: ccpa@policyalternatives.ca
© 2013 Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives | research • analysis • solutions | Want to use something on this site? View our terms of re(use)
Website Design & Development by Raised Eyebrow Web Studio