“We need the CCPA to remind us that our dreams of a decent, egalitarian society are reasonable — indeed that with a little work, they are practical. And I love that practicality, that protection of the dream of the possible.”
— Naomi Klein
March 24, 2010
Saskatchewan Budget 2010: Quality of our public services sure to suffer
Regina — Brad Wall stated that this year’s budget would lead Saskatchewan down “a different path.” Unfortunately, in a manner that is far too reminiscent of other conservative governments, the Saskatchewan Party has decided to make the public service bear the brunt of the government’s financial miscalculations.
The government plans to eliminate 15 percent of the civil service over four years along with the complete elimination of Saskatchewan Communications Network, the public educational broadcaster. Whether the government accomplishes these reductions through attrition, it will still mean a considerably smaller public service to deliver public programs.
The government seems to believe that the implementation of lean management-styles and other New Public Management reforms will be able to ensure the continuing delivery of quality public services with the bare minimum of public servants.
However these types of reforms – sometimes referred to as “management-by-stress” – have been roundly criticized in other jurisdictions as leading to the erosion of service delivery, as too much emphasis on cost reduction and the pursuit of efficiency at all costs leads to flawed policies with short-term gains, undermining the capacity of government to take a long-term perspective on issues such as education, technology, health and the environment.
The public service can only be expected to do so much with less support, less resources and less employees. No flavour of the month management style can remedy an under-staffed and over-loaded public service.
This government needs to be much clearer on what types of reforms and cuts it intends to introduce in the public sector and how these will affect service delivery in the province. Until the government does this, it simply stretches the imagination that we can lose 15 percent our public servants and not experience poorer quality services.
Simon Enoch, PhD
Director
Saskatchewan Office of the Canadian Centre
for Policy Alternatives (CCPA)
In partnership with RealRenewal, CCPA Saskatchewan is proud to present an education workshop for people who want a voice in the system.
Featuring Jacqui Strachan, Parent Involvement Coordinator, People for Education, Ontario.
Discussion Roundtables on Saskatchewan Aboriginal/First Nations, Rural and Urban Education Issues
Sunday, March 14, 2010 
1:00 - 4:30 p.m.
Pasqua Neighbourhood Centre, Regina
263 Lewvan Dr. (off Wascana St.)
Free of Charge - Childcare Provided.
Limited seats. Please register online at www.realrenewal.org or call 585-4449.
For more information, visit us here.
The following editorial appeared in the March 2nd edition of the Regina Leader-Post.
Barbara Yaffe's Feb. 20 column, "Public sector should share our pain," is a perfect example of the current misinformation campaign over public sector pensions.
Public sector pensions are defined benefit plans which workers pay into, deferring present income for the future. In 2008, retired public service workers received an annual average pension of $23,422, hardly overly generous.
Our current deficit is the result of increased Employment Insurance benefits and stimulus spending, it has nothing to do with public sector pensions, which as the most recent actuarial report shows, is adequately funded and has a surplus.
Rather than attacking public workers, we should be asking why private sector pension plans have proved so inadequate as a means to secure a decent retirement for Canadian workers.
If anything, the private sector should be emulating the stability of public sector plans.
All Canadians deserve retirement security, whether in the public or private sector. Engaging in a race to the bottom over pension benefits will only leave us all poorer as a result.
Simon Enoch
Enoch is Director, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives -- Saskatchewan Office.
The Social Policy Research Unit at the University of Regina has posted a video of the Regina night of our "Future of Social Democracy" event held last October. For those of you that missed Armine Yalnizyan and Murray Dobbin speak on the continuing relevance of the Regina Manifesto, here is your chance to experience two great speakers and their thoughts on the future of social democracy in our country.
The video can be viewed here.
Simon Enoch, Director of the Saskatchewan office, will present a public lecture on the future of environmental politics at the University of Regina on January 15th.
Simon's presentation, "Green Leviathan Reborn? Authoritarianism and the Contradictions of Ecological Crisis," will investigate the emergence of authoritarian responses to the current environmental crisis and the absolute necessity of a participatory democratic politics to any viable solution to the present crisis.
Time and location can be found here.
The second part of our "Future of Social Democracy" event is now available as a podcast. Listen to Murray Dobbin as he outlines what it will take to renew social democracy in Canada.
Armine Yalnizyan joined us in Saskatoon in October to speak on the continuing relevance of the Regina Manifesto. To listen to Armine's powerful and entertaining talk, visit here.
The Social Policy Research Unit at the University of Regina has just released its report card on child and family poverty in the province. Paul Gingrich and Fiona Douglas - the study's authors - report some troubling findings:
• In 2007, there were 35,000 (16.7%) children under age 18 living beneath the poverty line (before-tax Low Income Cut-off) in Saskatchewan.
• Saskatchewan has the third highest provincial child poverty rate.
• 45% of Aboriginal children live in low-income families.
• More than one in three immigrant children are poor.
• 20% of children spent three or more years in poverty, exceeding the national average of 15%.
• One-third of poor children live in families with full-time, full-year employment.
For more details, view the full report here.
For more details on income inequality in Saskatchewan, view the CCPA's "Boom and Bust: The Growing Income Gap in Saskatchewan," here.

With the Financial Times lamenting the “end of the era of liberalization” and the “death of global free-market capitalism” and Newsweek declaring “we are all Socialists now,” one could be forgiven for believing that the worst excesses of neoliberalism have been relegated to the dustbin of history. But for all the talk of resurgent Keynesianism, reports of the death of neoliberalism - the pathological fear of all things public and the idolatrous worship of the market - are greatly exaggerated. While the advocates of free-market orthodoxy have remained uncharacteristically quiet during the current economic crisis, neoliberalism has merely gone underground, biding its time until it can resurface with renewed ferocity.
It would seem that the neoliberal resurgence is already upon us, as governments around the world begin to deploy the all-too-familiar rhetoric of deficit and debt crises to prepare their citizens for the inevitable attack on what remains of the public sector. In the morbidly ironic words of Queensland Premier Anna Bligh - who has initiated a sweeping public-sector wage freeze and benefit clawback, coupled with the sale of over $15 billion in state assets - “public services have to come first in the dire global economic crisis.”
Canadians have seen this before. During the supposed “debt crisis” of the 1990s, the common refrain was that Canada would face outright bankruptcy and International-Monetary-Fund-imposed austerity unless it pursued a vigorous gutting of all things public. Paul Martin’s infamous 1995 budget did just that, sacrificing 45,000 civil service jobs, privatizing CN Rail and Petro-Canada, slashing federal transfers to the provinces and transforming unemployment insurance into the woefully inadequate program it is today.
Progressive economist Jim Stanford argues that much of this belt-tightening was not only unnecessary, but ultimately damaging to the Canadian economy. As Stanford documents, Canada could have reached its deficit reduction targets through economic growth alone, without having to endure the draconian cuts to our social programs. Stanford concludes that the $50 billion in public programs and assets that were sacrificed to the deficit gods would have “made an incredible difference to the concrete quality of Canadians’ lives” had they remained invested in public services and assets.
What Stanford and others emphasize is that the gutting of our public services was not an economic necessity, but rather an ideologically driven political gambit. We would be wise to remember this when the inevitable calls for belt-tightening and self-sacrifice in the name of fiscal responsibility once again rear their heads. Though the current deficit is smaller (relative to GDP) than what we faced in the 1990s, we are already hearing the early warning signs of the coming austerity from the Harper Conservatives.
Despite Finance Minister Jim Flaherty’s past insistence that the deficit can be resolved without cuts to programs or tax increases - a position from which he appears to be retreating day by day - the Tories have already shown their preference for the public sector to bear the brunt of fiscal austerity through their attempts at eliminating pay equity and the right-to-strike in the public service. Couple this with the Tories’ Crown asset review, wherein any public asset not deemed self-sustaining could face the auction block, and the writing is on the wall. Due to their minority status, the Tories have had to move carefully on these fronts, but rest assured that when it comes to a choice between reversing their ill-conceived and ill-timed tax cuts or cutting public sector jobs and social programs, the public sector will lose.
Those who would use the deficit to resurrect neoliberalism will deploy the same shopworn rhetoric of the past. We will be exhorted to “do it for the children,” lest we leave them our bills to pay, while simultaneously being praised for our courage as we are asked to sacrifice for the good of the nation. The gutting of the public sector is one choice among many; there is always an alternative.
In many ways, the deficit crisis of the 1990s locked Canada into the straitjacket of neoliberal policy, destroying what was left of the fragile post-war social contract that had held sway for close to 50 years. The 1995 deficit-busting budget inaugurated Canada’s wholesale embrace of neoliberalism; the current deficit must not be used to revive that same failed ideology.
Simon Enoch, Director of the Saskatchewan Office, comments on the return of debt crisis rhetoric with the current recession and what it may mean for Canada's public sector.
“We need the CCPA to remind us that our dreams of a decent, egalitarian society are reasonable — indeed that with a little work, they are practical. And I love that practicality, that protection of the dream of the possible.”
— Naomi Klein